Abstract
This study examines assertive illocutionary acts in President Joe Biden’s political speech using Searle’s (1979) speech act theory as the analytical framework. In political discourse, language functions not only to convey information but also to perform actions such as stating beliefs, presenting claims, and shaping audience understanding. This research focuses on how assertive speech acts are used to express viewpoints, organize ideas, and construct political messages. The data were taken from President Joe Biden’s Farewell Address to the Nation and analyzed using a descriptive qualitative method. A total of 24 assertive utterances were identified and classified into five types: asserting, concluding, describing, claiming, and reporting. Asserting is the most dominant type with 8 occurrences (33.4%), followed by describing and claiming with 5 occurrences each (20.8%). Concluding and reporting each appear 3 times (12.5%). The findings indicate that assertive illocutionary acts are frequently used to present beliefs, explain situations, and evaluate political actions. This study contributes to pragmatic analysis by showing how assertive acts function within an authentic political speech and how they support political communication through structured and purposeful language use.
References
Arellano, J. C., Izumi, M., & Martínez Nourdin, C. A. (2025). Presidential speeches in Chile (1832–2021): A methodological approach. Political Studies.
Austin, J. (1962). How to Do Things with Words.
Bagus, I. G., Ari, N., Ayu, I. G., & Widiadnya, V. (2024). Assertive illocutionary act found in Rendall Park’s speech video at UCLA 2023. Elysian Journal: English Literature, Linguistics, and Translation Studies, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36733/elysian.v4i1.7482
Bakke, K. M., O’Loughlin, J., Toal, G., & Vetik, R. (2025). Politicizing memory: Evidence from Ukraine. Nationalities Papers.
Charteris-Black, J. (2014). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Laguage and power ((2nd.ed)). Longman.
Handayani, V., & Wibowo, H. (2025). Locutionary and illocutionary acts by Anies Baswedan in the first presidential candidate debate in 2024. STAIRS: English Language Education Journal, 6(1), 1–10.https://doi.org/10.21009/stairs.6.1.1
Khater, H. A., Al-Momani, H. S., & Alzyoud, M. S. (2024). Pragmatic analysis of King Abdullah’s speech on the 25th Accession to the Throne Day. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1)
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Liu, Q. (2023). Analysis of governmental open letters mobilizing residents in China during the COVID-19 pandemic. Discourse & Society, 34(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221116980
Liu, R.-Y. (2024). Constituting institutional identity in political discourse: The use of the first-person plural pronoun in China’s press conferences. Language in Society, 53(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404523000386
Lopez, C. (2025). Narratives and collective memory. Current Opinion in Psychology, 63, 101994
Ma, L., Crosthwaite, P., & Li, S. (2025). Constructing China’s national image through political discourse: A corpus-based diachronic analysis of government work reports (2001–2025). Journal of World Languages.
McGregor, S. C. (2025). Dialogue on difference: Identity and political communication. Communication Monographs.
Searle, J. . (1979). EXPRESSION AND MEANING: studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. www.cambridge.org/9780521229012
Sabtiana, R., & Siregar, O. V. (2024). AN ANALYSIS OF ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS IN VLADIMIR PUTIN’S ELECTION VICTORY SPEECH. Celtic : A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 11(2), 582–595. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v11i2.37801
Sierp, A. (2025). The politics of memory: Between history, identity and conflict. Government and Opposition.
Takas, E., & Prodromitis, G. (2023). Representations and social influence in political discourse in times of crisis. In E. Takas, S. Iordanidou, & N. Jebril (Eds.), Political discourse and media in times of crisis (pp. 43–62). Anthem Press.
Tanto, T., & Tanusy, J. (2024). THE REPRESENTATION OF INDONESIAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE IN MEDIA: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS. Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 8(1), 185-198. https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v8i1.218
Vaara, E., Aranda, A. M., & Etchanchu, H. (2024). Discursive legitimation: An integrative theoretical framework and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 50(6), 2343–2373. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063241230511
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, ideology, and discourse (In K. Brow).
Wu, W., & Zhang, X. (2025). Constructing national identity in public health crises: A discourse-historical analysis of UNGA speeches by China and the United States. Frontiers in Public Health, 13.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Ni Wayan Kesuma Dewi, Ida Ayu Putri Gita Ardiantari