METAPHORICAL CONCEPTS AND THEIR IDEOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS IN ALURING VOTES FOR INDONESIAN PRESIDENCY
pdf

Keywords

Conceptual Metaphor
General Election
Ideology
Political Discourse

How to Cite

Budiman, A., & Khristianto, K. (2023). METAPHORICAL CONCEPTS AND THEIR IDEOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS IN ALURING VOTES FOR INDONESIAN PRESIDENCY. Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v8i1.216
Views
  • Abstract 744
  • pdf 707
Statistics reflect real-time downloads and views.

Abstract

This study is to reveal the metaphor used in political talks among the supporters of running mates in Indonesian General Election of 2019, those are Jokowi as the incumbent, and Prabowo as the competitor. This applied a content analysis to explore the use of metaphor in the political speeches. The data source included the news and the videos containing metaphors produced by the politician supporting the candidates. The theory applied in investigating the metaphors are conceptual metaphor (Lakoff and Johnson:1980), and the Critical Metaphor Analysis, CMA (Charteris-Black: 2004). Some conceptual metaphors drawn from their metaphorical expressions are NATION IS A BUILDING, functions to criticize that the building couldn’t stand on the lie, hiding the history of competitor candidate, Prabowo. Other metaphors from the incumbent are targeted to Rocky Gerung (RG), as a tough and intelligent speakers in Indonesian political discourse. Budiman Sujatmiko took the concept of DEBATING IS A PLAY, undermining the arguments in RG’s statements. Meanwhile, the supporters in Prabowo Camp focuses on criticizing the behavior of the existing government and leaders, by creating concepts of MISUSING IS STEALING, PRESIDENT IS A SCHOOL BOY, SWEARING IS A SENSATION, TO LEAD IS TO SUFFER. These two different metaphors go into an ideology with different direction. In one side, the incumbents claim that the government has failed. In another, the opposants believe that it has failed, by proving their bad behaviors

pdf

References

Agbo, I. I., Kadiri, G. C., & Ijem, B. U. (2018). Critical metaphor analysis of political discourse in Nigeria. English Language Teaching, 11(5), 1-10. Canadian Center of Science and Education.

Al Amery, A. S. A. (2023). A critical discourse analysis of ideology and power relations in a political interview. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies (JHSS), 5(9), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.32996/jhsss

Andry, A., & Syarif, H. (2021). An analysis of satire delivered by political observer Rocky Gerung in Indonesia Lawyer Club (ILC). E-Journal of English Language & Literature, 10(1), 44-51.

Badara, A., & Jamiludin. (2020). Representation of Indonesian women workers: A critical discourse analysis on the newspapers of nationalist-secular and Islamic ideological perspectives. IJIMS: Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies, 10(1), 79-101.

Bratoz, S. (2014). Metaphors in political discourse from a cross-cultural perspective. IJEMS, 7(1), 3-23. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Bussmann, H. (2006). Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics (G. Trauth & K. Kazzazi, Trans.). Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Cameron, L. (2008). Metaphor and talk. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 75-91). Cambridge University Press.

Goatly, A. (2007). Metaphor and ideology. Ilha do Desterro, 53, 63-93.

Hamrita, M. (2016). The metaphorical and ideological representation of the political opponent in the hardline Islamist discourse in Tunisia. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 4(6), 95-102.

Karnedi. (2011). A cognitive approach to metaphor translation: A case study of translating an economics textbook from English into Indonesian. Lintas Bahasa Translingua, 15(1), 63–98.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual metaphor in everyday language. The Journal of Philosophy, 77(8), 453-486. Retrieved from JSTOR.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Mammadov, A. (2010). Metaphors in American and Russian political discourse. Rask Journal, 31.

Miscevic, N. (2023). Nationalism. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2023 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2023/entries/nationalism/

Muller, R. (2005). Creative metaphors in political discourse: Theoretical considerations on the basis of Swiss speeches. University of Fribourg.

Surjowati, R. (2020). Disclosing Australian newspapers’ ideologies in reporting political news through social actor representations strategy: CDA perspective. Nobel: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 11(1), 38-54. https://doi.org/10.15642/NOBEL.2020.11.1.38-54

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Ideological discourse analysis. Retrieved from https://www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Ideological%20discourse%20analysis.pdf

Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). Ideology and discourse: A multidisciplinary introduction. Retrieved February 20, 2020, from http://www.discourses.org/UnpublishedArticles/Ideology%20and%20discourse.pdf

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Arif Budiman, Khristianto Khristianto

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.