ID
d.s.nugraha@usd.ac.id
Keywords
How to Cite
Nugraha, D. S. (2023). THE TEXTUAL THEME POTRAYED ON THE TALKS OF EDUCATION IN THE INDONESIAN TEDX: A SYSTEMIC FUNCTIONAL LINGUISTICS APPROACH: a Systemic Functional Linguistics Approach. Lire Journal (Journal of Linguistics and Literature), 7(1), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.33019/lire.v7i1.185
Views
- Abstract 527
- pdf 509
Abstract
This study sought to describe education-related conversations or talks of education (TE) from a systemic functional linguistics (SFL) perspective, focusing on how textual themes were deployed by speakers. TEDx talk, a reliable online source, was chosen as the source for the data used to support this study. The analysis’s validated data was the transcription of an education-related speech. Documentation, transcription, and in-depth textual fragmentation were the three primary techniques utilized during data processing and analysis. This study demonstrates, based on its findings, that the textual theme was not utilized in all portions of speech; it was the type of theme for which the speaker was required to provide further information. Despite the limitations of performance, a particular construction and functionalization have been applied to the textual theme. There were phrasal and clausal formulations of textual themes, as well as their role within multiple themes
References
Abhakorn, J. (2013). Classroom interaction and thinking skills development through teacher-talks. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 34(1), 116-125.
Bartlett, T., & O’Grady, G. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Bloor, T., Bloor, M., Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. The Functional Analysis of English. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774854
Brooks, C. F. (2016). Role, power, ritual, and resistance: A critical discourse analysis of college classroom talk. Western Journal of Communication, 80(3), 348-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2015.1098723
Caliendo, G., & Compagnone, A. (2014). Expressing epistemic stance in University lectures and TED talks: a contrastive corpu-based analysis. Lingue e Linguaggi, 11, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v11p105
Compagnone, A. (2015). The reconceptualization of academic discourse as a professional practice in the digital age: A critical genre analysis of TED Talks. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (54), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22947
Compagnone, A. (2016). The Pragmatics of Spoken Academic Discourse in the Framework of ted Talks: A Case Study. In Pragmatic Issues in Specialized Communicative Contexts (pp. 71-91). Brill.
Crible, L., Abuczki, Á., Burkšaitien?, N., Furkó, P., Nedoluzhko, A., Rackevi?ien?, S., ... & Zikánová, Š. (2019). Functions and translations of discourse markers in TED Talks: A parallel corpus study of underspecification in five languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.012
Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2021). Analysing EMI teachers’ and students’ talk about language and language use. In Language Use in English-Medium Instruction at University (pp. 34-55). Routledge.
Falloon, G., & Khoo, E. (2014). Exploring young students' talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 77, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.008
Griskell, H. L., Gámez, P. B., & Lesaux, N. K. (2022). Bi-literacy and motivation as predictors of bilingual students’ talk during classroom discussion. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(5), 1665-1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1798870
Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. London: Routledge.
Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.35360/NJES.240
Jerome, C., & Ting, S. H. (2022). What’s in a message: A systemic functional analysis of cancer prevention messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 32(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJAL.12380
Jing, N., & Jing, J. (2018). Teacher talk in an EFL classroom: A pilot study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(3), 320-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0803.07
Kirkpatrik, (2017). How important is argument?. Journal of Second Language Writing, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.006
Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 243–276. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALING.55.2008.3-4.2
Kumar, T. (2021). The impact of written visual materials in the development of speaking skills in English language among secondary level students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 1086-1095.
Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). The concept of power in teacher talk: A critical discourse analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(8), 1208-1215.
Nugraha, D. S. (2017). Struktur Tema-Rema dalam Teks Abstrak Berbahasa Indonesia. Sirok Bastra 5 (1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v5i1.91
Nugraha, D. S. (2020). The Information Structure on Newspaper Headlines of the Bahasa Indonesia and the English: a Contrastive Study. In Language and Language Teaching Conference 2019.
Nugraha, D. S. (2020). The comparative analysis of syntactic features between Indonesian and English denominal verbs. LiNGUA, 15(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v15i1.7680
Nugraha, D. S. (2022a). Abstract in Undergraduate Thesis: a Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetorical Moves and Thematic Patterns of Indonesian EFL Students. Eralingua 6(1), 82-102 https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v6i1.28161
Nugraha, D. S. (2022b). Ciri Morfosemantik Afiks Derivasional {ber-} dalam Konstruksi Verba Denumeralia Bahasa Indonesia (Morphosemantic Features of Derivational Affix {ber-} in Indonesian Denumeral Verb Constructions). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 8(1), 31-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v8i1.9543
Nugraha, D. S. (2022c). Morphosemantic Features Of Membuat ‘Make’ in The Light Verb Constructions of Indonesian. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v17i2.17757
Pavavijarn, S. (2022). Influences of Thematic Progression on Quality of EFL Argumentative Writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 282–319.
Potestades, R. R. (2021). Exploring the Role of Teacher Talk in the Gender Identity Construction of Filipino Children. In International Perspectives on Diversity in ELT (pp. 131-151). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74981-1_8
Schiffer, (2005). The Things We Mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siahaan, H. V. F., Setia, E., Saragih, A., & Hanafiah, R. (2022). Thematic Development Analysis on Sunday Sermon Texts in Batak Christian Protestant Church. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 220. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V12N6P220
Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–689. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554505
Thomasson, (2022). How should we think about linguistic function? Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2074886
Wei, J. (2015). Theme and thematic progression in Chinese college students’ English essays. Theme and Thematic Progression in Chinese College Students’ English Essays, 1–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0254-0
Westera, M., Mayol, L., & Rohde, H. (2020). TED-Q: TED Talks and the Questions they Evoke. In Calzolari N, Béchet F, Blache P, Choukri K, Cieri C, Declerck T, Goggi S, Isahara H, Maegaard B, Mariani J, Mazo H, Moreno A, Odijk J, Piperidis S, editors. Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference; 2020 May 13-15; Marseilles, France. Stroudsburg (PA): ACL; 2020. p. 1118-27. ACL (Association for Computational Linguistics). http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46320
Zhiyu, X. (2021). Critical Metaphor Analysis of Teacher Talk Based on Cognitive Frame. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4(11). https://dx.doi.org/10.25236/FER.2021.041107
Bartlett, T., & O’Grady, G. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge.
Bloor, T., Bloor, M., Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. The Functional Analysis of English. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774854
Brooks, C. F. (2016). Role, power, ritual, and resistance: A critical discourse analysis of college classroom talk. Western Journal of Communication, 80(3), 348-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2015.1098723
Caliendo, G., & Compagnone, A. (2014). Expressing epistemic stance in University lectures and TED talks: a contrastive corpu-based analysis. Lingue e Linguaggi, 11, 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v11p105
Compagnone, A. (2015). The reconceptualization of academic discourse as a professional practice in the digital age: A critical genre analysis of TED Talks. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (54), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22947
Compagnone, A. (2016). The Pragmatics of Spoken Academic Discourse in the Framework of ted Talks: A Case Study. In Pragmatic Issues in Specialized Communicative Contexts (pp. 71-91). Brill.
Crible, L., Abuczki, Á., Burkšaitien?, N., Furkó, P., Nedoluzhko, A., Rackevi?ien?, S., ... & Zikánová, Š. (2019). Functions and translations of discourse markers in TED Talks: A parallel corpus study of underspecification in five languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 142, 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.012
Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2021). Analysing EMI teachers’ and students’ talk about language and language use. In Language Use in English-Medium Instruction at University (pp. 34-55). Routledge.
Falloon, G., & Khoo, E. (2014). Exploring young students' talk in iPad-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 77, 13-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.008
Griskell, H. L., Gámez, P. B., & Lesaux, N. K. (2022). Bi-literacy and motivation as predictors of bilingual students’ talk during classroom discussion. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(5), 1665-1680. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1798870
Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M. (2013). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. London: Routledge.
Herriman, J. (2011). Themes and theme progression in Swedish advanced learners’ writing in English. NJES Nordic Journal of English Studies, 10(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.35360/NJES.240
Jerome, C., & Ting, S. H. (2022). What’s in a message: A systemic functional analysis of cancer prevention messages. International Journal of Applied Linguistics (United Kingdom), 32(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJAL.12380
Jing, N., & Jing, J. (2018). Teacher talk in an EFL classroom: A pilot study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(3), 320-324. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0803.07
Kirkpatrik, (2017). How important is argument?. Journal of Second Language Writing, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.006
Krifka, M. (2008). Basic notions of information structure. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 243–276. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALING.55.2008.3-4.2
Kumar, T. (2021). The impact of written visual materials in the development of speaking skills in English language among secondary level students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2), 1086-1095.
Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). The concept of power in teacher talk: A critical discourse analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(8), 1208-1215.
Nugraha, D. S. (2017). Struktur Tema-Rema dalam Teks Abstrak Berbahasa Indonesia. Sirok Bastra 5 (1), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v5i1.91
Nugraha, D. S. (2020). The Information Structure on Newspaper Headlines of the Bahasa Indonesia and the English: a Contrastive Study. In Language and Language Teaching Conference 2019.
Nugraha, D. S. (2020). The comparative analysis of syntactic features between Indonesian and English denominal verbs. LiNGUA, 15(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v15i1.7680
Nugraha, D. S. (2022a). Abstract in Undergraduate Thesis: a Study of Linguistic Realizations of Rhetorical Moves and Thematic Patterns of Indonesian EFL Students. Eralingua 6(1), 82-102 https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v6i1.28161
Nugraha, D. S. (2022b). Ciri Morfosemantik Afiks Derivasional {ber-} dalam Konstruksi Verba Denumeralia Bahasa Indonesia (Morphosemantic Features of Derivational Affix {ber-} in Indonesian Denumeral Verb Constructions). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 8(1), 31-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v8i1.9543
Nugraha, D. S. (2022c). Morphosemantic Features Of Membuat ‘Make’ in The Light Verb Constructions of Indonesian. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 17(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v17i2.17757
Pavavijarn, S. (2022). Influences of Thematic Progression on Quality of EFL Argumentative Writing. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 282–319.
Potestades, R. R. (2021). Exploring the Role of Teacher Talk in the Gender Identity Construction of Filipino Children. In International Perspectives on Diversity in ELT (pp. 131-151). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74981-1_8
Schiffer, (2005). The Things We Mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Siahaan, H. V. F., Setia, E., Saragih, A., & Hanafiah, R. (2022). Thematic Development Analysis on Sunday Sermon Texts in Batak Christian Protestant Church. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 220. https://doi.org/10.5430/WJEL.V12N6P220
Steedman, M. (2000). Information structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, 31(4), 649–689. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438900554505
Thomasson, (2022). How should we think about linguistic function? Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2074886
Wei, J. (2015). Theme and thematic progression in Chinese college students’ English essays. Theme and Thematic Progression in Chinese College Students’ English Essays, 1–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0254-0
Westera, M., Mayol, L., & Rohde, H. (2020). TED-Q: TED Talks and the Questions they Evoke. In Calzolari N, Béchet F, Blache P, Choukri K, Cieri C, Declerck T, Goggi S, Isahara H, Maegaard B, Mariani J, Mazo H, Moreno A, Odijk J, Piperidis S, editors. Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference; 2020 May 13-15; Marseilles, France. Stroudsburg (PA): ACL; 2020. p. 1118-27. ACL (Association for Computational Linguistics). http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46320
Zhiyu, X. (2021). Critical Metaphor Analysis of Teacher Talk Based on Cognitive Frame. Frontiers in Educational Research, 4(11). https://dx.doi.org/10.25236/FER.2021.041107
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.