ID
Christina.eli@atmajaya.ac.id
How to Cite
- Abstract 853
- pdf 534
Abstract
Realizing the importance of teaching grammar to young learners, pre service teachers, as prospective teachers, need to reflect their own grammar teaching performance. Moreover, during the covid-19 pandemic outbreak where all learning processes are conducted online, teaching strategy needs to be considered. Therefore, this study aimed to find out whether the pre-service teachers apply the deductive or inductive teaching instructions in teaching grammar to young learners during the online class and to investigate how pre-service teachers develop the instructions. To reach the objectives, qualitative research was employed by observing and analysing the teaching videos of thirteen pre service teachers. The pre service teachers were the students of English Education Department in a private university in Jakarta who enrolled the Teaching Internship program. All videos were transcribed and then the analysed data were put in a table and coded to ease the identification of deductive and inductive instructions. The results revealed that more students adopted deductive grammar instructions in teaching grammar for young learners rather than inductive instruction. Furthermore, the way the pre service teachers developed both instructions followed the PPP and TTT models with different emphasis on the Presentation and Teach parts. The tendency done in the Presentation part for inductive teaching was the pre service teacher acted as instructor whereas the Teach part in inductive teaching was as facilitator. Eventually, from this study it can be concluded that pre service teachers adopted deductive and inductive grammar instructions because both are suitable for teaching grammar to young learners in online classroom setting within consideration of meaningful learning activities.
References
[2] Aslan, A. (2016). Language teaching models in teacher training programs. Turkish Online Journal of English Language Teaching (TOJELT), 1(3), 135–143. https://www.academia.edu/28559748/Language_Teaching_Models_in_Teacher_Training_Programs
[3] Behjat, F. (2008). Inductive vs deductive grammar instruction and the grammatical performance of EFL learners. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-13.
[4] Biktimirov, E.N., & Klassen, K.J. (2008). Relationship between use of online support materials and student performance in an introductory finance course. Journal of Education for Business, 83. doi: 10.3200/JOEB.83.3.153-158
[5] Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[6] Cheurprakobkit, S., Hale, D. F., & Olson, J. N. (2002). Technicians’ perceptions about webbased courses: The University of Texas system experience. The American Journal of
Distance Education, 16(4), 245-258.
[7] Damayanti, F.L., & Rachmah, N. (2020). Effectiveness of online vs offline classes for ESL classroom: a study case in a higher education. Journal of English Teaching, Applied Linguistics and Literature, 3(1), 19-25.
[8] Ellis, R. (1993). Talking shop: second language acquisition - how does it help teachers? ELTJ, 47, 3-11.
[9] Faidal, N.F., Nur, R., & Suriani. (2020). The teachers' pedagogic competence in teaching English through online and offline setting. ELT Worldwide, 7(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v7i1.13294
[10] Graus, J., & Coppen, P.A. (2016). Student teacher beliefs on grammar instruction. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 571-599.
[11] Hamdani, Z., & Amrizal. (2018). Presentation – practice – production (PPP) method: an alternative method used in enhancing student’s vocabulary mastery. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 9(1). doi: 10.26877/eternal.v9i1.2407
[12] Mike Allen, J. B. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to
traditional classrooms in higher education: a meta-analysis. The American
Journal of Distance Education, 83-97. Article p83-97 2002.
[13] Nernere, M.S. (2019). The tendency of English teachers in teaching grammar for young learners. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 13(3), 141-152. doi: 10.19105/ojbs.v13i2.2254
[14] Nunan, D. (1991). Language Teaching Methodology. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International.
[15] Okoli, A.C. (2017). Relating communication competence to teaching effectiveness: implication for teacher education. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3). Retrieved from www.iiste.org.
[16] Sullivan, J. (2011). Taking charge: teacher candidates' preparation for the oral proficiency
interview. Foreign Language Annals, 44(2), 441-457. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01129.x
[17] Tiittanen, M. (2020). The deductive and inductive instructional approach controversy in Eswatini context. Global Journal of Foreign Language
Teaching. 10(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v10i2.4852
[18] Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2006). Teaching courses online: a review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 93-135.